Agricultural Irrigated Land and Irrigation Water Use in Utah


Utah is considered the second driest state in the United States (Utah Division of Emergency Management [UDEM], 2022). The average precipitation for 1981–2020 was 14 inches per year in Utah1 (PRISM Climate Group [PRISM], 2021). As a result, much of the agriculture and horticulture in Utah depends upon irrigation. This article is a summary of several estimates of the extent of agricultural irrigation in Utah and some associated trends.

Irrigated Agricultural Lands in Utah

It is difficult to determine with certainty the total irrigated agricultural area of Utah. For example, should that include only land currently irrigated? Should land not presently irrigated but that has been irrigated in the past and will be in the future be included?

Several estimates of irrigated land in Utah exist from official sources. The source with the longest record is the U.S. Department of Agriculture - National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS), which has included data on irrigation in Utah since the 1890 Census of Agriculture. Over time, the Census of Agriculture has included varying data related to irrigation. Since 1979, USDA-NASS has published what is now known as the Irrigation and Water Management Survey in conjunction with the Census of Agriculture published every five years. As the name suggests, 


  • The amount of irrigated agricultural land in Utah has been relatively constant at approximately 1.1 to 1.2 million acres since the Great Depression.
  • Agricultural irrigation water withdrawals
    and consumptive water use have been
    relatively constant over the last several
    decades, with possible declines in
    diversions in the last decade.
  • Sprinkler irrigation is now the most
    common method of agricultural irrigation in terms of area irrigated.
  • Over 80% of irrigated agricultural lands in Utah are used to produce alfalfa, pasture, or other hay crops.

the data presented in the Irrigation and Water Management Survey are based on surveys rather than measurements. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has also published estimates of irrigated land since 1985 as part of its Estimated Use of Water in the United States reports, which are also published every five years. In addition to these federal sources, the Utah Division of Water Resources (UDWRe) maintains a geospatial database of irrigated land in Utah, which is currently available for 2020 through the Utah Geospatial Resource Center (UGRC, 2022). Finally, Utah State University (USU) Extension also conducted irrigated acreage surveys during the mid-1990s to mid-2000s. Data from these sources were compiled to understand the overall trend in irrigated area in Utah (Figure 1).

Based on the USDA-NASS data, there was a steady increase in irrigated land in Utah from 1890 to 1920. Then, there was a possible decrease in irrigated land during the Depression years. Following that period, irrigated land has remained relatively consistent near 1.1 million acres, according to USDA-NASS numbers. The USGS estimated a mean of about 1.3 million acres of irrigated land in the last three decades. The USU Extension estimates from 1995 to 2000 are also about 1.3 million acres. Based on the UDWRe data (UGRC, 2022), there were about 1.35 million acres of irrigated agriculture in 2020, though some data in that dataset are known to not represent irrigated land. The 2007 survey by USU Extension included 1.47 million acres of irrigated land, which is the largest quantity of any in the compiled data.

The variability of the results presented in Figure 1 is evidence of the uncertainty involved in quantifying the total irrigated area of Utah. This variability results from differences in quantification methods, interannual variability, etc. However, many of the estimates are close, and it is reasonable that Utah’s active irrigated agricultural area may be approximately 1.1 to 1.2 million acres (1,700–1,900 square miles). By comparison, Utah’s total land area is about 82,200 square miles (Census Bureau, 2018). Therefore, about 2.1% to 2.8% of Utah’s land is irrigated agriculture. In turn, Utah contains about 2.2% of the total 3.5 million square miles of land in the U.S.2 Based on the 2018 Irrigation and Water Management Survey, there were about 60 million acres of irrigated agricultural land in the United States. Utah had about 2.1% of the total irrigated land in the U.S. Consequently, Utah ranked 15th among states in irrigated area. Neighboring states of Idaho, Colorado, and Wyoming all had more irrigated land, while Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico had less.

Irrigated Agriculture Graph
Figure 1. Irrigated Agricultural Land in Utah From Four Sources (NASS, USU, USGS, UDWRe)
The USGS total irrigation may include some golf courses.

Distribution of Irrigated Agricultural Lands in Utah

Utah’s distribution of irrigated land is constrained by topography, climate, soils, water availability, and infrastructure. Much of Utah is mountainous and is, therefore, too high in elevation or too steep for irrigation. High elevations are comparatively cool and restrict agricultural production. Soil depth, soil chemistry, presence of rocks, etc., can also limit the land’s arability. Much of the irrigation in Utah is concentrated in valley bottoms where surface water exists (Figure 2). The West Desert and the Eastern Plateau are relatively devoid of irrigated agriculture.

Irrigated Agriculture Utah Map
Figure 2. Map of Utah’s Irrigated Agricultural Land in 2020 (UDWRe)
Some lands on the map are known to not be irrigated.
Sources: UGRC (2022), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2009a, 2009b), and USGS (2022).

County-level irrigated land data have been collected by the USGS since 1985. At that time, Box Elder County had the largest estimated amount of irrigated land at about 108,000 acres and Grand County had the least at about 3,900 acres (Figure 3). In 2015, the USGS reported 146,000 acres of irrigated land in Box Elder County, again the largest of any county. The county with the least irrigated land in 2015 was Salt Lake County with 6,100 acres. The increase in acreage from 1985 to 2015 may not be a true representation of trends in agricultural irrigation (see Figure 1). For example, Box Elder County irrigated land was similar in the 1989-1999 UDWRe analysis as in 2022.

1986 irrigated area
2022 irrigated area
Figure 3. Maps of Utah’s Irrigated Agricultural Land in 1986-1992 and 2022 (UDWRe; Boundary Data From NRCS [2009a,b])
The 1985 data may include some golf courses.

Agricultural Irrigation Methods in Utah

Utah agricultural lands are irrigated using various methods, including surface methods (e.g., furrow, basin, wild flooding), sprinkler methods (e.g., center pivots, wheel line systems, hand line sprinklers), and others, like subirrigation and drip. Many of the irrigated lands in Utah have been irrigated for a century or more. Early irrigation development occurred near surface water sources and in areas serviceable by human-made canals. These lands were first irrigated using surface irrigation methods or subirrigation, which involves controlling the water table to irrigate crops from below. Over time, pump technologies developed that enabled expanded development of groundwater resources and water conveyance uphill. The increased adoption of such technologies is evident in data reported by USDA-NASS (Figure 4). Sprinkler technologies were also developed that allowed for irrigating lands unsuitable for surface irrigation.

With the advent of sprinklers and the gradual increase in sprinkler-irrigated land came a corresponding decrease in surface irrigation in Utah (Figure 5). USDA-NASS first reported sprinkler use in 1950, which corresponds to a timeframe when significant improvements had been made in sprinkler irrigation (Keller & Bliesner, 2000). In 1950, there were an estimated 1,770 acres of sprinkler-irrigated agricultural land in Utah (less than 0.2% of the state’s irrigated area). By 2013, more land was irrigated by sprinklers than by surface irrigation. As of the 2018 survey, land irrigated by sprinklers was about 666,000 acres (56% of Utah’s irrigated agricultural land). These same trends are evident, though less clear, when the other datasets (USGS, USU, UDWRe) are considered (Figure 6).

Irrigated Pump Graph
Figure 4. Irrigation Pumps and Pumped Wells in Utah (NASS)
Total pumps in 1910 is for total pumping plants.
Irrigated Land Graph
Figure 5. The Spatial Extent of Agricultural Irrigation Methods in Utah (NASS)
Dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals for the plotted values. Subirrigation was included in surface irrigation starting in 2013. Some areas were irrigated using multiple methods.

USDA-NASS began reporting subtotals for land irrigated using different sprinkler methods in 1979. From that time until the late 1990s, the growth in sprinkler-irrigated area was from a combination of increased wheel line, center pivot, and lateral-move irrigation (Figure 7). Since the late 1990s, the increase in area irrigated by sprinkler systems has been in center pivot and lateral-move systems. This has been associated with a decline in hand line systems. Decreased labor requirements and, more recently, remote access for center pivots are likely drivers of these changes.

As of 2018, USDA-NASS estimated that Utah had the second largest amount of land under wheel line systems of any state, behind only Idaho. This area represents about 14% of the total land under wheel line systems in the U.S. In the same year and survey, Utah had about 3% of the total area irrigated by hand line systems in the U.S., ranking sixth overall. Utah ranked far less for center pivots, solid sets, or big guns.

Changes in types of surface irrigation have been less evident than for sprinkler systems. However, USDA-NASS data shows a general decline in furrow irrigation and wild flooding over the past few decades (Figure 8). Utah ranked eighth among states for wild flooding, with about 5% of the total such area in the U.S. Utah had about 3% of the U.S. area of both border/basin irrigation and furrow irrigation.

Irrigated Land Graph
Figure 6. The Spatial Extent of Agricultural Irrigation Methods in Utah From Four Sources (NASS, USU, USGS, UDWREe)
For USDA-NASS, subirrigation was included in surface irrigation starting in 2013. Some areas were irrigated using multiple methods for USDA-NASS. This is not the case for the other three estimates. The jump in subirrigation in the 2007 USU data is likely a change in survey methodology and may include land that was not considered irrigated in previous USU surveys. The USGS data may include some golf courses.
Irrigated Area Graph
Figure 7. . Total Agricultural Area in Utah Irrigated by Sprinkler Methods (NASS)
Wheel-move acreage for 1994 and prior includes other types of “mechanical move” sprinklers. “Other” includes big guns and solid sets along with the USDA-NASS “Other” classification.
Irrigated Area Graph
Figure 8. Total Agricultural Area in Utah Irrigated by Surface Methods (NASS)
“Other” includes subirrigation in 2013 and 2018.

Agricultural Irrigation Withdrawals in Utah

The USGS has reported estimated irrigation withdrawals (diversions or groundwater pumping) for Utah since 1950. Data included golf courses for at least some of those years. Overall, there was little change in agricultural water use from 1950 to 2015 (Figure 9). There has been, however, an increase in municipal and industrial withdrawals. No clear trend exists in the municipal and industrial withdrawals because of the comparatively large municipal and industrial withdrawal in 1980 resulting from large public supply and industrial withdrawals. Based on these data, irrigation (including some golf courses) has accounted for an average of 84% of Utah’s total withdrawals since 1950 and 80% in 2015. This fraction was reduced to 75% more recently, based on Utah’s Coordinated Action Plan for Water, 2022.

Annual Withdrawals Graph
Figure 9. Total Water Withdrawals for Utah (USGS)
Only freshwater withdrawals are included.

Distribution of Agricultural Irrigation Withdrawals in Utah

The distribution of withdrawals reported by the USGS for agricultural irrigation in Utah is correlated with the irrigated acreage, though not perfectly. In 1985, the county with the largest total withdrawal for irrigation was Box Elder at 349,000 acre-feet per year and the county with the least was Kane with 9,000 acre-feet per year (Figure 10). An acre-foot is about 325,850 gallons. In 2015, Box Elder had the greatest total irrigation withdrawal for agriculture with 459,000 acre-feet. Kane, again, had the smallest total agricultural irrigation withdrawal with 14,000 acre-feet that year.

The relative changes in irrigation withdrawals are more evident when considered as a fraction of the total withdrawal for each county (Figure 11). In 1985, 49% of the total withdrawals for Salt Lake County were for irrigation. In 2015, that fraction had been reduced to 12% for agricultural irrigation and 18% when golf course irrigation was considered. The largest decreases in the percentage of total withdrawals used for agricultural irrigation were along the Wasatch Front and in Morgan, Wasatch, and Washington counties. This decrease is expected because those areas are hot spots for urban growth in the state. Some changes evident in Figure 11 between 1985 and 2015 relate to the 1985 map including some golf courses, while the 2015 map is only agriculture. Golf course irrigation was about 6% of total withdrawals in Davis, Salt Lake, and Washington counties in 2015 and about 3% in Summit and Weber counties. The rest of the counties had a smaller fraction.

1985 irrigation withdrawals
2015 irrigation withdrawals
Figure 10. Maps of Utah’s Agricultural Irrigation Withdrawals in 1985 and 2015 (USGS)
The 1985 data may include some golf courses.
1985 irrigation withdrawals
2015 irrigation withdrawals
Figure 11. Maps of Utah’s Agricultural Irrigation Withdrawals as a Percentage of the Total Withdrawals in 1985 and 2015 (USGS)
The 1985 data may include some golf courses.

Consumptive Use of Agricultural Irrigation Water in Utah

In addition to the overall water withdrawal for irrigation, it is important to understand the fraction of that withdrawal consumptively used. Consumptive use is the loss of water from a hydrologic system. Most commonly, for irrigation, consumptive use is considered to be evapotranspiration of irrigation water into the atmosphere. Evapotranspiration is a combination of water evaporation and plant transpiration. Evapotranspiration from precipitation is not included. The USGS has provided estimates of consumptive use from irrigation since 1960 (Figure 12). Since 1960, consumptive use has accounted for an estimated average of about 62% of irrigation withdrawals in Utah, with an estimated 68% in 2015. It should be noted that methods used to estimate consumptive use have changed over the years.

Annual Withdrawals Graph
Figure 12. Estimated Consumptive Use and Non-consumptive Withdrawals of Irrigation Water in Utah (USGS)
Estimates may include some golf courses, which accounted for about 1% of both presented values in 2015.

Distribution of Agricultural Irrigation Consumptive Use in Utah

The distribution of consumptive use among Utah counties was similar to that of irrigation withdrawals in 1985 and 2015 (Figure 13).

1985 irrigation consumption
2015 irrigation consumption
Figure 13. Maps of Utah’s Estimated Consumptive Use of Agricultural Irrigation Water in 1985 and 2015 (USGS)
The 1985 data may include some golf courses.

Irrigated Crops in Utah

In Utah, alfalfa, other hay crops, and pasture account for over 80% of the total irrigated area (Figure 14). Roughly 15% of the irrigated area was in corn and small grains. All other crops, including orchards and vegetable crops, accounted for the remaining few percent of the irrigated agricultural area in Utah. The approximately 20% of Utah irrigated cropland that is pasture has been relatively stable between 19% and 28% since 1950 according to USDA-NASS data. The statewide irrigated crop mix reflects the significant role that livestock plays in Utah agriculture and the subsequent need for forage. Alfalfa is a dominant crop in Utah also because of the relatively high-quality alfalfa hay that can be produced in Utah compared to some other places, and for many other reasons. Furthermore, many areas of Utah are too high in elevation to grow much besides pasture and hay crops. Much of the land that was favorable for fruit and vegetable crops in Utah has been converted to urban uses. Additionally, many agricultural markets have concentrated in certain high-producing areas of the country. This has reduced the available market for some crops.

irrigated cropland chart 2017
irrigated cropland chart 2007
irrigated cropland chart 2022
Figure 14. Percentages of Crops Produced on Utah’s Irrigated Agricultural Land (NASS, USU Irrigated Acreage Survey, UDWRe)


Irrigation is an important feature of agriculture in Utah. The distribution of irrigated land and irrigation water use varies across the state, based on water availability, topography, and soils. In recent years, sprinkler irrigation has overtaken surface methods as the dominant irrigation method, based on irrigated area, in Utah. About 75% to 80% of water withdrawals in Utah are for irrigation, with about 68% of that water being consumptive use. Alfalfa, other hay crops, and pasture are grown on about 80% of the irrigated agricultural lands in Utah.


1 Based on this dataset, Utah ranked third behind Nevada and Arizona, in that order.

2 In the 2020 U.S. Census, Utah’s population was 3.27 million people, which was just less than 1% of the 33.1 million total for the U.S. (Census Bureau, 2021). 


Published November 2022 (Revised July 2023)
Utah State University Extension
Peer-reviewed fact sheet

Download PDF


Burdette Barker, Matt Yost, and Cody Zesiger

Burdette Barker

Burdette Barker

Irrigation Specialist

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Phone: 435-797-3926
Office Location: ENGR 227, UWRL 240
Matt Yost

Matt Yost

Agroclimate Specialist

PSC Dept

Phone: 435-797-4210
Cody Zesiger

Cody Zesiger

Extension Assistant Professor | Agriculture & Natural Resources | Weber, Morgan and Davis Counties

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Phone: 801-399-8208
Office Location: Weber, Davis, and Morgan Counties

Related Research