By Hope Northagen, Ethan Gilliam | June 30, 2025

Cutthroat Trout in Utah

Bonneville Cutthroat
Cutthroat trout
Figure 1. Bonneville Cutthroat Trout in a Stream
Photo from McKell, 2021, Utah Division of Wildlife, public domain

This fact sheet is intended to inform anglers, aquatic recreationalists, and backyard conservationists interested in learning about a Utah native species, current restoration steps, and how their actions can help professionals restore native cutthroat trout populations. The introduction of non-native trout species in Utah has led to the decline of native cutthroat trout populations and ranges throughout the state. Conservation professionals have led research projects dedicated to identifying and restoring native cutthroat trout habitat, with the goal of reestablishing their numbers. Community engagement can be vital in spreading awareness for conservation efforts. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR) and Trout Unlimited have worked together to provide a statewide angler fishing challenge, where the proceeds help fund native cutthroat trout restoration projects.

The Cutthroat Trout

The cutthroat trout (Figure 1) is the only native trout species in Utah (Hepworth et al., 1997). The native cutthroat trout thrives in cold-water streams with rockier bottoms free from fine silt and sediment. Dense riparian vegetation is also necessary to provide fish cover and shade to keep water temperatures low. In the winter, these trout also utilize deep pools for safety from predation and icing over (Brunson, 2020). There are four native subspecies of cutthroat trout in Utah: Bonneville cutthroat trout, Yellowstone River cutthroat trout, Bear River cutthroat trout, and Colorado River cutthroat trout (Utah Cutthroat Slam, n.d.). Subspecies are genetically distinct from each other and are oftentimes the result of population isolation due to geographic elements (mountain ranges, river system changes) (Shiozawa et al., 2018).

Non-native fish species, such as brown trout, brook trout, and rainbow trout, can be classified as invasive or artificially introduced and share the same water as the cutthroat trout (Budy et. al., 2021). These non-native species were stocked in Utah’s waters to increase angling opportunities. However, due to resource competition between native and non-native species, the cutthroat trout populations rapidly dwindled. Non-native trout outcompete cutthroat trout for food, habitat, reproduction, and at times, prey on juvenile cutthroat (Brunson, 2020). In the 1970s, Utah’s state fish, the Bonneville cutthroat trout, was thought to be nearly extinct, and researchers began conservation efforts to reestablish their populations (Hepworth et al., 1997).

Identification and Range

To help cutthroat trout conservation and awareness, the Utah DWR and Trout Unlimited partnered to create the Utah Cutthroat Slam. This is an organization that provides resources on native subspecies ranges (Figure 2), identification (Figure 3), and organizes a fishing challenge for Utah anglers (Utah Cutthroat Slam, n.d.). Participants pay a small fee to enter the challenge and must catch all four cutthroat subspecies in their historic native range to “complete the slam.” Their photos are featured on the website, and those who complete the slam are awarded a medallion for their efforts. The money raised by the slam fees is used for cutthroat conservation and restoration projects in Utah (Utah Cutthroat Slam, n.d.).

Map of four subspecies of cutthroat trout in Utah
Figure 2. Native Range Map for Four Subspecies of Cutthroat Trout in Utah
Source: Trout Unlimited, 2025, reprinted with permission

Chart Detailing Subspecies’ Descriptions and Native Ranges
Figure 3. Chart Detailing Subspecies’ Descriptions and Native Ranges
Chart: Hope Northagen, with data from Bengston, 2015, and Utah Cutthroat Slam, n.d.

Restoration and Conservation Efforts

Present-day threats to the cutthroat trout include habitat degradation and loss, drought conditions, disease, and non-native species competition. These long-standing issues have led to displaced cutthroat trout populations, prompting researchers and wildlife officials to create and execute a management plan to restore numbers and historic ranges in Utah (Hepworth et al., 1997). Although restoring native cutthroat trout habitat and populations is ecologically beneficial, Utah locals engage in and enjoy catching artificially introduced trout species (Brunson, 2020). Striking a balance between cutthroat trout conservation efforts and maintaining successful non-native fisheries (brown, brook, and rainbow trout) to meet angling needs will be essential for wildlife officials.

Areas of restoration are chosen based on available habitat that can sustain cutthroat populations and allow for sufficient natural reproduction away from the threat of non-native trout competition (Uthe, 2015). Most restoration areas are void of cutthroat trout before selection. To restore native cutthroat streams, researchers use various methods:

  • Electrofishing. This is a mechanical removal strategy (Brunson, 2020).
  • Chemically removing fish. Using rotenone can remove non-native species. Rotenone is created from a tropical plant and applied to the stream, which fish absorb through the gills, killing them quickly. Although it is non-specific (i.e., affects all fish, not solely non-native fish), exposure to the sun, combined with the chemical binding to organic material found in the stream sediment, breaks down rotenone, thus detoxifying the stream after treatment (Budy et. al., 2021).
  • Raising downstream waterfalls. Figure 4 shows a strategically raised downstream waterfall (also referred to as a “fish migration barrier”) to prevent upstream travel of non-native fish.
  • Restocking streams with native fish. Finally, local professionals partner with local fish hatcheries to restock the stream segment with cutthroat trout. This method has proven efficient in a tributary of the Logan River in northern Utah. From a decade-long study, researchers found that introducing juvenile

Bonneville cutthroat trout after removing invasive, non-native brown trout led to rapid recovery of cutthroat trout populations within the tributary study site. Bonneville cutthroat trout have reached carrying capacity, or the maximum number of fish the habitat can sustain, within 6 years of the project, indicating natural reproduction, sufficient habitat, and prevention of non-native predation events (Budy et. al., 2021).

Waterfalls
Figure 4. Waterfall Fish Migration Barrier Before Restoration (left) and After Restoration (right)
Photo from McKell, 2021, Utah Division of Wildlife, public domain

Summary

As society evolves, expands, and progresses, environmental impacts are inevitable and expected. This has allowed more sensitive species, such as the cutthroat trout, to dwindle in abundance. However, through careful research and conservation efforts, scientists are able to restore the habitats and populations of sensitive native organisms. Additionally, fishing and participating in events, such as the Utah Cutthroat Slam, engages the community in local fisheries science, conservation, and aquatic management. For non-anglers, maintaining good environmental stewardship is imperative to keeping Utah’s waters and surrounding habitat healthy for species like the native cutthroat trout. As the community connects with and understands the environment, we feel more accountable in caring for it and appreciating the organisms that call Utah’s streams home.

References

Utah State University Extension Peer Reviewed verification logo

June 2025
Utah State University Extension
Peer-reviewed fact sheet

Download PDF

Authors

Hope Northagen, Sevier County Director; Ethan Gilliam, USU Extension Assistant Professor

Ethan Gilliam

Ethan Gilliam

Extension Assistant Professor | Agriculture and Natural Resources | BQA State Coordinator- UTAH | Sevier County Director

Agriculture and Natural Resources

Phone: 435-893-0474
Office Location: Sevier County
 

Events