soil testing
2007 Kane and Garfield County Soil Analysis Summary
Kevin Heaton
Utah State University Extension
 
            In cooperation with local farmers, USU Extension sampled the soil and prepared it for analysis in forty-six fields in Kane and Garfield Counties. Soil samples were submitted to Utah State University’s Soil Testing Laboratory and analyzed for texture, pH, salinity, phosphorous, and potassium. The average test results were pH 7.5 (normal), salinity 1.0 (normal), phosphorous 11.4 ppm (marginal), and potassium 202 ppm (adequate). If farmers base their fertilizer application rate on the average soil test, they could save a significant amount of money on fertilizer, but less than 15% of the farmers would be applying the appropriate amount of fertilizer and crop production would suffer. In fact, 30% of the field’s phosphorous test result indicated “very low” which would require 200-250 lbs of phosphorous (P2O5)/acre. Whereas, the average field (marginally deficient phosphorous field) would only require 50-100 lbs of phosphorous (P2O5)/acre. Approximately 30% of the phosphorous test results indicated that no fertilizer was needed which is a significant cost savings to farmers, particularly as fertilizer costs continue to skyrocket.  
 
When comparing individual soil analysis, the differences become more apparent.   For instance, phosphorous levels ranged from very low 2.4 ppm to high 36.0 ppm. Twenty-eight fields (62%) had “very low” or “low” phosphorous test results. Potassium levels ranged from “low” 52 ppm to “very high” 814 ppm. Soil texture, pH or salinity showed no influence to phosphorous or potassium test levels. All test results for soil pH were “normal” for local growing conditions.  Two of the forty-six fields, one field in Garfield and one field in Kane, had salinity values above 2 (EC = dS/m) which is the threshold for alfalfa. However, soil slightly above the threshold for salinity has minimal influence on production capability of the crop, usually resulting in less than a 10% reduction. If salinity issues continue to increase or is an agronomic problem for these fields, then the operator should apply excessive irrigation water (if there is adequate drainage) which will flush the salts below the root zone. 
The below graph highlights research conducted on alfalfa in Utah and shows yield response in relation to phosphorous fertilization (Koenig et al., 1999). Alfalfa fields testing less than 10 ppm phosphorous will yield between 60-90% of the maximum. Most definitely, farmers should evaluate the costs and net benefits derived from fertilizer applications.   
The below soil test data indicates that soil testing is essential to ensure proper fertilizer management. Farmers should not be fertilizing based off text book tables, salesman’s opinion or the Extension agents recommendation unless fertilizer applications are based on a soil analysis. A simple $12.00 test could save hundreds of dollars in fertilizer expenses or significantly improve crop production by application of the appropriate amount of fertilizer. Another good recommendation is to test agriculture fields every 3-5 years thus monitoring nutrients for optimum crop production.
 
 
           
 
 

The average and range (low/high) for Kane and Garfield County soil tests.
pH
Salinity
Phosphorous
Potassium
Avg
7.5
1.0
11.4
202.1
Low
6.6
0.4
2.4
52.0
High
8.2
2.7
36.0
814.0

 
 
References:
 
Koenig, R., B. Kitchen, C. Hurst and J. Barnhill. 1999. Phosphorus and potassium fertilization of
irrigated alfalfa in Utah. Pp 57-62 in T.L. Tindall (Ed) Proceedings of the Western Nutrient
Management Conference, March 4-5, Salt Lake City, UT.
 
 

Recommendations of phosphorus fertilizer based off soil test results.
Phosphorus Test
(ppm)
Rating
Recommendations (P2O5/Ac)
< 3 ppm
Very Low
200-250 lbs
4-7 ppm
Low A
150-200 lbs
8-10 ppm
Low B
100-150 lbs
11-15 ppm
Marginal
50-100 lbs
>15 ppm
Adequate
0 lbs

 

2007 Soil Test Results for Kane and Garfield Counties
County
Number
Texture
PH
Salinity
Phosphorous
Alfalfa
Potassium
Alfalfa
Garfield
7010232
Loamy Sand
7.75
0.4
11
Marginal
106
Marginal
Garfield
7010233
Loam
7.17
1
16
Adequate
218
Adequate
Kane
7010722
Clay Loam
7.7
0.9
24
Adequate
266
High
Kane
7010723
Clay Loam
7.81
0.8
12.8
Marginal
212
Adequate
Kane
7010889
loam
8.18
0.66
9.1
Low B
120
Marginal
Kane
7010890
Sandy Loam
8.08
0.98
6.2
Low A
108
Marginal
Kane
7011104
Silty Clay
7.89
0.75
3.3
Very Low
272
High
Kane
7011105
Clay Loam
7.79
1.22
3.6
Very Low
289
High
Garfield
7011129
Sand ?
3.9
Very Low
52
Low A
Garfield
7011130
Sand ?
3.4
Very Low
86
Low B
Garfield
7011338
Sandy Clay
7.52
1.41
8.1
Low B
158
Adequate
Garfield
7011339
Sandy Clay
7.42
2.67
6.4
Low A
219
Adequate
Garfield
7011340
Silty Clay Loam
7.67
1.56
16.1
Adequate
104
Marginal
Garfield
7011341
Silty Clay Loam
7.66
1.23
8
Low B
92
Low B
Kane
7011342
Silty Clay Loam
7.16
1
27
Adequate
112
Marginal
Garfield
7011343
Sandy Loam
6.59
0.93
31
Adequate
345
High
Garfield
7011344
Sandy Loam
7.1
1.5
33
High
814
Very High
Kane
7011732
Sandy Clay Loam
7.87
0.7
11
Marginal
188
Adequate
Garfield
7011762
Silty Clay Loam
6.78
1
16.6
Adequate
158
Adequate
Kane
7011763
Clay Loam
7.66
0.87
4.5
Low A
283
High
Garfield
7011764
Clay Loam
7.59
0.8
2.9
Very Low
71
Low B
Garfield
7011765
Silty Clay Loam
7.36
0.72
2.8
Very Low
193
Adequate
Garfield
7011766
Clay Loam
7.4
1
6
Low A
115
Marginal
Garfield
7011767
Clay Loam
7.46
1
18.4
Adequate
125
Marginal
Garfield
7011768
Silty Clay Loam
7.35
0.85
17.2
Agequate
192
Adequate
Garfield
7011769
loam
7.31
0.9
11.1
Marginal
201
Adequate
Garfield
7011770
Sandy Loam
7.48
0.4
2.4
Very Low
61
Low A
Garfield
7011771
Silty Clay Loam
7.49
0.86
3.5
Very Low
268
High
Kane
7011772
Silty Clay Loam
7.58
1.38
22
Adequate
343
High
Garfield
7011773
Clay Loam
7.5
0.76
10.6
Low B
479
Very High
Garfield
7011774
Clay Loam
7.09
0.42
36
High
364
High
Garfield
7011932
Loamy Sand
7.2
0.3
3.1
Very Low
61
Low A
Garfield
7011933
Loamy Sand
7.44
0.25
7.4
Low A
52
Low A
Garfield
7011934
Sandy Loam
7.07
0.25
4
Low A
81
Low B
Garfield
7011935
Loamy Sand
7.22
0.2
3.9
Very Low
98
Low B
Garfield
7011936
Sandy Loam
7.05
0.3
4
Low A
70
Low B
Kane
8010007
Clay Loam
7.34
0.7
24
Adequate
88
Low B
Kane
8010008
Sandy Loam
7.45
0.5
12.8
Marginal
125
Marginal
Kane
8010009
Clay Loam
7.46
0.45
7.3
Low A
140
Marginal
Kane
8010010
Clay
7.42
0.85
4.4
Low A
169
Adequate
Garfield
8010011
Loam
6.84
0.75
33
High
384
High
Garfield
8010012
Silt Loam
7.28
0.84
4.1
Low A
496
Very High
Kane
8010013
Clay Loam
7.59
0.9
3
Very Low
164
Adequate
Kane
8010014
Silty Clay Loam
7.97
2.53
3
Very Low
449
Very High
Kane
8010015
Silty Clay Loam
7.76
1.67
15.2
Adequate
159
Adequate
Kane
8010016
Clay Loam
7.96
1.24
6.9
Low A
148
Marginal